DISALLOWED (TrackBack)

Sandstorm Redux

Looking for some concise, sane and informed analysis of the Middle East chaos? Who isn't.

You might do well to check out our friend, Dr. Leon Hadar of CATO and author of the book Sandstorm. Leon was the guest and subject of a CATO policy book forum today. He was joined by a panel featuring Jim Pinkerton of Newsday and Fox News, as well as Geoff Kemp, nee Reagan NSC staff for Middle Eastern Affairs and currently with the Nixon Center. Christopher Preble, Director of Foreign Policy Studies for CATO, served as the able emcee.

Leon's innovative analysis has earned strongly positive reviews from James Fallows, Middle East Review, Foreign Affairs and others. That trend continued today with both Jim and Geoff Kemp.

In short, Leon advocates the United States abandon the prison of the outmoded Cold War paradigm mandating massive (and counter-productive) U.S. engagement in the Mid East in favor of a gradual disengagement and discernment of true U.S. national interest. You can get more info via the link to the reviews of Leon's book at Amazon. Over on the left there.

As Jim Pinkerton suggests, Leon's next book might be 'Avalanche!'


When Krauthammer et al. are clamoring for the U.S. to “go ashore”, Leon and as endorsed today by both Jim Pinkerton and Geoff Kemp, counsels doing the precise opposite. Leon and the commentators today at CATO all of course recognize that such “disengagement” and sloughing off the old Cold War paradigm will take time and must be done gradually. But all note that what is going on over there emphatically is NOT “our war” and other such AgitProp falsehoods.

I couldn't find a video of the event on the CATO site or I would link it here. Perhaps it is forthcoming. Leon, as you may know, is also very funny and the presentation today crackled with some wry humor. I second Geoff Kemp's recommendation today that Leon definitely should continue the analysis in a further work exploring alternative political architectures that would support such gradual disengagement.

You might want to consider picking up Sandstorm. For two reasons, actually. First, Leon's books and columns on the Middle East over the years have a rare almost prescient quality. And secondly, analysis oddly reminiscent to Leon's somehow seems to pop up under other bylines now and then — so you might as well get the 100% genuine undiluted stuff straight from the source.

Kudos to CATO, Leon and the commentators today on a terrific event.

Comments

Comment wrote:

Dr. Hadar makes many good points - but his prophetic admonishments to disengage will likely be ignored. Look to see American troops in Lebanon within a year. (maybe the Marines should call Maliki to see if he can recommend any good landlords). The next expedition of Marines to Lebanon will be sold by mixing arguments with hints of revanchism, along with promises of peace to come. Only the paleocons will speak out forcefully and so the issue will be marginalized politically. As soon as the Marine deployment is shown to be unwise, the Democrats will back away.

Friday 28 July 07:23

Comment wrote:

If Maliki happens to male any recommedations as to landlords, we'd counsel a second opinion and a check of references.

There is probably no person, no faction, that we will be able to trust and/or rely upon in any meanignful way if we go into Lebanon.

Which is one reason why Bush will probably be tempted to send Marines in. This adminstration has used our service personell to draw fire - to serve as flytraps. Perhaps, that's unintentional, but it seems to be that way.

Friday 28 July 08:19

Armchair wrote:

Thanks for the tip - Just watched the panel. Love watching that stuff. Dr. Hadar is too sensible, to sane, and too good humored to be able to win over the DC madhouse to his way of thinking.

It was amazing watching that panel - and to realize how marginalized there was of thinking is.

It's really crazy, when you think about it. There are all sorts of reasons to answer Hadar's points, but you know they all have nothing to do with the way political arguments are crafted these days.

Why do Americans have to risk their lived to secure oil for Europeans, Indians, and Chinese? Why?

Think about Israel with it's immense strength in emerging technologies. Now think about all the policies in recent times that we have pursued in recent times to help Israel.

The later has nothing much to do with the former.

We are really endanger of losing our country in the middle east if we are not carefull.

Sunday 30 July 20:34

Comment wrote:

Speaking of intelligent commentary, Noonan basically says intelligence is overrated. She says lower IQ's are nicer.

Sunday 30 July 21:14
DISALLOWED (TrackBack)

Add Comments

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it