{"id":7457,"date":"2012-10-04T05:25:34","date_gmt":"2012-10-04T12:25:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/?p=7457"},"modified":"2014-01-09T10:23:41","modified_gmt":"2014-01-09T17:23:41","slug":"obama-debates-romney-can-you-see-the-real-me-can-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/obama-debates-romney-can-you-see-the-real-me-can-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama Debates Romney:  &#8220;Can You See The Real Me? Can You?&#8221;*"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>W<\/b>e&#8217;re all social creatures in the end, responding to rational and irrational, often subconscious cues every day of our lives.  Obama&#8217;s calamitous first encounter with a Mountain Dew-amped Romney a case in point.<\/p>\n<p>We all saw the real Obama. It explains much about his tepid first term, his inability to engage in actual politics, his passive enabling of the Movement&#8217;s unnecessarily swift resurrection.  In other words?  Every single post here ever about him.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s dispense with canards.  Of course, Obama is rusty for debates.  So too, sitting presidents are unaccustomed to challenge.  The ephemeral opinion cycle (why bother calling it &#8216;news&#8217; anymore?) <i>minutiae<\/i> offers other transient tidbits about Obama&#8217;s alleged debate&#8217;strategy&#8217;, etc.  None really matter.<\/p>\n<h3>The True Obama Is Frankly Not Appealing<\/h3>\n<p>Obama as man and president doesn&#8217;t like practicing politics. Or deigning to talk <i>with<\/i> people to win their support.  Obama has two modes: aspirational bromide salesman and the reclusive decider, judging other people and policy.  Otherwise, he&#8217;s oddly more artificial than Romney.<\/p>\n<p>People intuitively sense when someone wants to win their support with passion (Clinton, in a compulsively needy but successful way).  Or even Romney.  Last night, Romney came across as someone doing a well rehearsed offering roadshow.  (We&#8217;ve done them with The Blackstone Group). He was selling.  As they say in the movie, &#8220;Always be closing&#8221;.  <\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t respond well as social animals to being told it&#8217;s rational to do this or that. Remember that relative from Hell at a holiday dinner?  Without aspirations, what does Obama really have to sell?  Beyond he&#8217;s a good compromiser? <\/p>\n<h3>Mitt, It&#8217;s President Kerry On Line Two<\/h3>\n<p>One debate doesn&#8217;t necessarily an election make. Look at President Kerry. Obama is bright enough to be coached to better performances.  As Lee Atwater famously said, &#8220;Once you fake sincerity, you&#8217;ve got it made&#8221;. We&#8217;ve a race over who&#8217;s the most plausibly inauthentic. <\/p>\n<p>Will the debates matter? Only to the extent they alter the few battleground states. Romney&#8217;ll gain ground in both Ohio and Virginia at least. Both candidates fluctuate within 47% to 51%.  We still think it&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s to lose but now with less margin for error.<\/p>\n<p>What disturbed us most about Obama&#8217;s debate performance?  What it means for Obama&#8217;s second term.  We saw last night Obama unleashed.  Feel the excitement?  <\/p>\n<p>Neither do we. But then, placeholders are rarely memorable.<\/p>\n<p>______<br \/>\n* At maximum volume.<\/p>\n<p>P.S. We&#8217;re loathe to remind the netroots and so-called progressives &#8216;We told you so.&#8217;  But we did.  Daily in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re all social creatures in the end, responding to rational and irrational, often subconscious cues every day of our lives. Obama&#8217;s calamitous first encounter with a Mountain Dew-amped Romney a case in point. We all saw the real Obama. It explains much about his tepid first term, his inability to engage in actual politics, his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","two_page_speed":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[64,25,16],"tags":[260,17,42,41],"class_list":{"0":"post-7457","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-election-2010","7":"category-election-2012","8":"category-change-baby","9":"tag-election-2012","10":"tag-obama","11":"tag-republicans","12":"tag-the-movement","13":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.stiftungleostrauss.com\/bunker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}